Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in failing to conduct an in camera hearing to determine whether he was entitled to full disclosure of a search warrant and supporting documents, which had been redacted to preserve the anonymity of the confidential informant. However, since the defendant did not request that the Supreme Court conduct such a hearing, his contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.