Jones asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his habeas corpus petition. For the following reasons, Jones's claim is meritless.
As the court of appeals correctly held, Jones did not attach all of his pertinent commitment papers, namely, copies of the sentences for the new crimes he alleged had expired. R.C. 2725.04(D); State ex rel. Lake v. Anderson (1997),
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.