1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 711 N.E.2d
  5. 711 N.E.2d 33 (1999)
 

IN RE CONTEMPT OF HOUSTON

No. 79S00-9809-DI-485.

711 N.E.2d 33 (1999)

In the Matter of CONTEMPT OF the Supreme Court of Indiana, Daniel K. HOUSTON, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

June 23, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

No appearance for the Respondent.

Donald R. Lundberg, Executive Secretary Seth Pruden, Staff Attorney Indianapolis, IN, for the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission.

PER CURIAM.

Today we find that by failing to respond to investigative subpoenas issued by the Disciplinary Commission, the respondent, attorney Daniel K. Houston, is in contempt of this Court.

The genesis of this contempt action is the Commission's September 11, 1998, Verified Information and Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Respondent Should not be Held in Contempt of Court, filed in accordance with Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23(9)(f), and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases