Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the appellant's disclaimer of coverage failed to comply with the requirements of Insurance Law § 3420 (d), and was thus ineffective to relieve the appellant of its obligation to pay the underlying money judgment entered against its insured (see, Hartford Ins. Co. v County of Nassau,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.