263 A.D.2d 475 (1999)

692 N.Y.S.2d 730

TONI A. SHAY et al., Respondents, v. DAVID A. JERKINS, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided July 12, 1999.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, those branches of the defendant's motion which were to dismiss the causes of action asserted by the plaintiffs Toni A. Shay, Lauren Shay and Kevin Shay are granted and the complaint is dismissed.

The affirmed reports prepared by a board certified orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Lawrence Miller, which the defendant submitted in support of his motion for summary judgment made out a prima facie case (see, CPLR 3212 [b]) that the plaintiffs Toni A. Shay and Lauren Shay did not sustain serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

The medical evidence which the plaintiffs submitted in opposition to the motion consisted of the affidavits sworn to by an orthopedist, Dr. David J. Weissberg, and a physical therapist, Robert Shapiro. Dr. Weissberg's finding that the plaintiff Lauren Shay had sustained a permanent loss of use of a body organ, member, function, or system was improperly based on her subjective complaints of pain (see, Licari v Elliott, 57 N.Y.2d 230). Dr. Weissberg's conclusion that the plaintiff Toni A. Shay had sustained a serious injury was based, inter alia, on the results of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging test (hereinafter MRI) which she had undergone. However, he did not indicate that he reviewed the actual MRI films nor did he attach a copy of a sworn MRI report to his affidavit. Therefore, the evidence was insufficient to establish that Toni A. Shay sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Merisca v Alford, 243 A.D.2d 613; Friedman v U-Haul Truck Rental, 216 A.D.2d 266).

The affidavit of the physical therapist was "of limited probative value" for the reasons stated by Justice Oshrin in the order which is the subject of this appeal.

The plaintiffs Toni A. Shay and Lauren Shay have thus failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see, CPLR 3212 [b]) and the causes of action asserted by them are dismissed. In light of our determination the derivative claims asserted by Kevin Shay must also be dismissed.


1000 Characters Remaining reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases