1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 66 F.Supp.2d
  5. 66 F.Supp.2d 669 (1999)
 

WALSINGHAM v. BIOCONTROL TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Civil Action No. 96-809.

66 F.Supp.2d 669 (1999)

Dennis WALSINGHAM, on his behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. BIOCONTROL TECHNOLOGY, INC., Diasense, Inc., David L. Purdy, Fred E. Cooper, and Glen Keeling, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

December 1, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Finberg, Peter C. Butcher, Malakoff, Doyle & Finberg, Pittsburgh, PA, Joseph H. Weiss, Weiss & Yourman, New York City, for Plaintiffs.

C. Richter Taylor, John K. Baillie, Houston Harbaugh, Pittsburgh, PA, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CINDRICH, District Judge.

This class action lawsuit arises from alleged violations of federal securities laws. The plaintiff filed a two count complaint asserting the following claims: Count One, violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act (the "Exchange Act"), 15 U.S.C. Section 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. Section 240.10b-5, against all...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases