1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 259 A.D.2d
  5. 259 A.D.2d 474 (1999)
 

PIETROMONACO v. SCHWARTZMAN

259 A.D.2d 474 (1999)

686 N.Y.S.2d 102

SHERI PIETROMONACO et al., Appellants, v. BORAH SCHWARTZMAN et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided March 1, 1999.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the Supreme Court properly determined that the continuous treatment doctrine does not apply to toll the Statute of Limitations applicable to their dental malpractice claim (see, CPLR 214-a). The record demonstrates that the dental treatment rendered by the defendants Borah Schwartzman, DDS, and Borah Schwartzman, DDS, P. C. (hereinafter collectively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases