1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 177 F.3d
  5. 177 F.3d 547 (1999)
 

U.S. v. HENDRICK

No. 97-1512.

177 F.3d 547 (1999)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cindy HENDRICK, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed May 21, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Scott E. Pederson, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellant. John C. Bruha, OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Scott E. Pederson, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellant. John C. Bruha, OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellee.

Before: MERRITT and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges; NIXON, District Judge.

JOHN T. NIXON, District Judge.

In this appeal, Defendant-Appellant, Cindy Hendrick, argues that the district court erroneously interpreted United States Sentencing Guideline § 2X2.1 to require that a defendant convicted of aiding and abetting in the commission of an offense be given the same base offense level as the principal offender. For the reasons expressed below, we reverse the judgment of the district court with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases