FUTERSAK v. BRINEN


265 A.D.2d 452 (1999)

697 N.Y.S.2d 89

SAUL FUTERSAK et al., Respondents, v. JOSEPH BRINEN, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided October 18, 1999.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We reject the defendant's contention that the injured plaintiff should be compelled to submit to an additional physical examination. While there is no restriction in CPLR 3121 (a) on the number of examinations to which a party may be subjected, an additional examination is permissible only where the party seeking the examination demonstrates the necessity for it (see, Huggins v New York City Tr. Auth.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases