Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that his convictions on count No. 1 charging rape in the second degree, count Nos. 13 and 25 charging sodomy in the second degree, and count No. 37 charging sexual abuse in the second degree should be reversed on the ground that they were rendered duplicitous by the testimony at trial (see, People v Farbman,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.