The testimony of the undercover officer that his partner, an undercover police cadet, was served an alcoholic beverage by petitioner's bartender without being asked for identification, together with the cadet's driver's license and police identification card showing that at the time he was so served the cadet was under 21 years of age, constituted substantial evidence of petitioner's violation of Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 (1) (see, O.F.B., Inc. v New York...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
