In this action to enforce an unsatisfied judgment for unpaid wages against shareholders in the employer corporation, plaintiffs' mere allegation that defendant was an owner of the corporation does not, without more, raise a triable issue as to whether he was an employer for purposes of Labor Law §§ 190 and 650. Additionally, the IAS Court properly found defendant-respondent was not a shareholder of the corporation at the time plaintiffs' claims...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
