PAGE v. RILEY

No. 98-2669.

85 Ohio St.3d 621 (1999)

PAGE ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. RILEY, JUDGE, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 16, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

O'Diam, McNamee & Hill Co., L.P.A., and James M. Hill; Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder Co., L.P.A., and Lynne K. Schoenling, for appellants.

Mathias H. Heck, Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Chris R. Van Schaik, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee Judge Riley.

Bieser, Greer & Landis, L.L.P., James H. Greer and Joseph C. Oehlers, for appellees Denny and Patricia Strong.


Per Curiam.

Appellants assert in their propositions of law that Judge Riley erred in denying their request for extraordinary relief in prohibition. In order to be entitled to a writ of prohibition, appellants must establish that (1) Judge Riley is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, (2) the exercise of that power is unauthorized by law, and (3) denial of the writ will cause injury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases