1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 263 A.D.2d
  5. 263 A.D.2d 443 (1999)
 

ASKENAZI v. HYMIL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.

263 A.D.2d 443 (1999)

692 N.Y.S.2d 705

JUDITH ASKENAZI, Appellant, v. HYMIL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. CRANTEX FABRICS et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided July 6, 1999.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

As a result of the plaintiff's failure to comply with a conditional order of preclusion dated February 20, 1998, that conditional order became absolute (see, Michaud v City of New York, 242 A.D.2d 369, 370; Clissuras v Concord Vil. Owners, 233 A.D.2d 475). In order to avoid the adverse impact of the conditional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases