We agree with the IAS Court that appellant's denial of plaintiff's allegation that it was the developer, general contractor, construction manager or a subcontractor at the site leaves unresolved exactly what its role was at the site. The deficiency of appellant's proof in this regard leaves no occasion for considering the quality of plaintiff's opposing proof (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.