Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court correctly determined that the respondent had effectively terminated the parties' contract pursuant to its terms, prior to the appellants' application for a Yellow-stone injunction (see, First Natl. Stores v Yellowstone Shopping Ctr.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.