FABRE v. DAMART ENTERS.


182 Misc.2d 514 (1999)

701 N.Y.S.2d 242

JOSE FABRE, Appellant, v. DAMART ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

July 12, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jose R. Mendez, P. C., Rego Park, for appellant.

Mauro & Goldberg, Great Neck (Kenneth Mauro and Cynthia A. Holfester of counsel), and Barron, McDonald, Carroll, Cohen & Harris, New York City (Diane L. DeVita of counsel), for respondents.

KASSOFF, P. J., ARONIN and SCHOLNICK, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

Order unanimously reversed without costs and motion denied without prejudice to renewal upon proper papers.

Defendants, in support of their motion pursuant to CPLR 2004 to extend their time to answer the complaint, alleged that plaintiff's attorney orally agreed to such extension but thereafter denied such agreement and rejected the answer as untimely. Defendants' application included a copy of the proposed answer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases