1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 261 A.D.2d
  5. 261 A.D.2d 429 (1999)
 

CITIBANK, N.A. v. BHIDE

261 A.D.2d 429 (1999)

687 N.Y.S.2d 300

CITIBANK, N. A., Respondent, v. VIDYADHAR A. BHIDE et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided May 10, 1999.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellants' challenge to the stipulation of settlement entered into in this action is unpersuasive. The credible evidence in the record refutes the appellants' claim that the attorney who agreed to the settlement on their behalf failed to explain the significance of the term "with prejudice", and they have failed to establish any valid basis for vacating the stipulation of settlement (see, Yuzary v Yuzary,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases