Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to vacate the order entered upon its failure to timely serve an answer, given its failure to state an excusable delay and a meritorious defense (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Miles v Blue Label Trucking,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.