An issue of fact exists as to whether the parties' 1996 remuneration agreement was a novation discharging defendant employee's 1994 note to plaintiff employer or merely a modification of their 1994 remuneration agreement. This issue is raised by ambiguity in the 1996 agreement in this regard and conflicting extrinsic evidence of the parties' intent (see, Mallad Constr. Corp. v County Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
