1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 261 A.D.2d
  5. 261 A.D.2d 419 (1999)
 

PEOPLE v. McFADDEN

261 A.D.2d 419 (1999)

692 N.Y.S.2d 395

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. REGINALD McFADDEN, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided May 3, 1999.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that his statements to Nassau County Detectives Richard Lane and Martin Alger were improperly admitted at trial because the hearing court had suppressed those statements. This contention is without merit since it was the defendant himself, not the People, who elicited the subject statements during the defendant's cross-examination of Detective Lane (see generally, People v Gole,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases