We find no basis to disturb the factual determination of the court that defendant was informed of the additional charge being considered by the Grand Jury on February 16, 1996, well before his Grand Jury testimony of February 20, 1996. In any event, the prosecutor was under no duty to advise defendant of these charges as "[t]he Grand Jury notice provisions of CPL 190.50 (5) do not impose upon the prosecution an obligation to provide notice of separate charges presented to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
