1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 134 Ohio
  5. 134 Ohio App.3d 541 (1999)
 

HOUGHTALING v. CITY OF MEDINA BD. OF ZONING APPEALS

No. 2896-M.

134 Ohio App.3d 541 (1999)

HOUGHTALING et al., Appellees, v. CITY OF MEDINA BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Ninth District, Medina County.

Decided July 14, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ian S. Haberman, for appellees.

Prudence C. Spink, for appellant.

BATCHELDER, Judge.

Appellant, the Medina City Board of Zoning Appeals appeals from the judgment of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas reversing the board's decision finding that appellees James and Victoria Houghtaling were in violation of the Medina City Zoning Code. We affirm.

I

The Houghtalings are the owners of a travel business known as "Pleasure Cruises." Pleasure Cruises acts like a travel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases