Defendant's allegations that he orally requested plaintiff to sell the stock it held as collateral at a time when the stock still had value are unsubstantiated. Moreover, they are inconsistent with the fact that during and shortly after the purported conversations, agreements to extend the loan generated correspondence from both sides that never mentioned the collateral, and are also inconsistent with the fact that after defendant again fell into default, he did not object...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
