PETERSON v. DEPT. OF LABOR AND IND.

No. C0-98-1734.

591 N.W.2d 76 (1999)

Marlys PETERSON, et al., Petitioners, v. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied May 18, 1999.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas Peine, St. Paul, MN (for petitioners)

Michael A. Hatch, Attorney General, Julie Swedback, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN (for respondent)

Christopher M. Hood, Flaherty & Koebele, P.A., St. Paul, MN (for amicus curiae Minnesota Association of Rehabilitation Providers)

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, Presiding Judge, SHORT, Judge, and KLAPHAKE, Judge.


OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Petitioners invoke our declaratory power under Minn.Stat. § 14.44 (1998) to determine whether Minn. R. 5220.1900, subpts. 1b and 1c (1993), which freezes and caps the hourly rates of qualified rehabilitation consultants, violates the Equal Protection Clauses of the Minnesota and United States Constitutions.

FACTS

In 1992, in response to the rising costs of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases