Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the trial court failed to balance the probative value and prejudicial effect of allowing inquiry, if the defendant were to testify, into three of his prior convictions is without merit. The trial court properly exercised its discretion when it ruled that such information could be used on cross-examination (see, People v Walker,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.