Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted for a new trial on the issue of liability, with costs to abide the event.
We agree with the plaintiff that the evidence at trial so preponderated in his favor that the jury could not have reached its verdict on any fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Lolik v Big V Supermarkets,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.