The verdict in defendant's favor upon plaintiff's negligence and unseaworthiness claims was neither irrational nor against the weight of the evidence. The evidence permitted the jury fairly to conclude that the allegedly defective valve was not the proximate cause of plaintiff's accident and injury. In this connection, we note that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in limiting the testimony of plaintiff's expert to the defective condition of the steam supply...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
