The first appeal is untimely because the notice of appeal was served more than 30 days after service of a copy of the order with notice of entry (CPLR 5513 [a]). Concerning the second appeal, the only "new" evidence that plaintiff submitted on her motion to renew was the affidavit of the surviving plaintiff that she was wearing a seatbelt at the time of the accident, a fact obviously known to her at the time of the original motion seeking, among other things, dismissal of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.