Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. Probable cause was established by defendant's resemblance to the description provided by the undercover officer, the proximity of defendant's arrest, both in distance and in time, to the drug transaction, and the absence of anyone else meeting the description.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's determinations...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
