1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 86 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 86 Cal.Rptr.2d 536 (1999)
 

CURTIS v. KELLOGG & ANDELSON

No. B117633.

86 Cal.Rptr.2d 536 (1999)

73 Cal.App.4th 492

Thomas A. CURTIS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. KELLOGG & ANDELSON et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

Rehearing Denied August 11, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Liner, Yankelevitz, Sunshine, Weinhart & Regenstreif, Stuart A. Liner, Peter J. Pitchess, Santa Monica, and D. Michael Oberbeck, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Garrett & Tully, Stephen J. Tully and Daniel D. Kopman, Pasadena, for Defendant and Respondent Kellogg & Andelson.

Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard, Mary G. Whitaker and Wayne C. Smith, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Cohen, Primiani & Foster.

CURRY, J.

The issue raised in this appeal is whether either appellant Thomas A. Curtis, M.D. ("Dr.Curtis"), or his medical corporation, appellant Thomas A. Curtis, M.D., Inc. ("the Corporation"), have standing to pursue a claim for legal malpractice purportedly assigned to Dr. Curtis by the Chapter 7 trustee for the Corporation. We conclude, under the circumstances presented here, that only the trustee had standing to pursue the claim, and affirm the judgment of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases