The contents of the complainant's 911 call were properly admitted under the excited utterance exception, since the statements were clearly made under the stress of excitement caused by the crime (see, People v Edwards,
The challenged portion of the prosecutor's summation was proper because it was based on the trial testimony. Defendant had ample opportunity to exploit an inconsistency between the testimony...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.