The IAS Court properly cancelled the notice of pendency since service of the summons and complaint was not made upon defendants within 30 days of the filing of the notice of pendency (see, CPLR 6512, 6514 [a]). While process was mailed in a timely fashion pursuant to CPLR 312-a, the attempt at service by mail was ineffective since the entity to which the process was purportedly directed was not registered as defendants' designated agent for service of process and,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.