DALLAL v. CITY OF NEW YORK


257 A.D.2d 354 (1999)

683 N.Y.S.2d 63

GEORGE DALLAL et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, and HERBERT SCHIMMEL et al., Appellants-Respondents, et al., Defendant. CITY OF NEW YORK, Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ISRAEL DISCOUNT BANK OF NEW YORK, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided January 5, 1999.


Despite the attempt of the Director of the Big Apple Pothole and Sidewalk Protection Corporation to refute the factual premise underlying such decision, the holding of the Court of Appeals in Katz v City of New York (87 N.Y.2d 241, 245) that it is a "reasonable expectation that in the event two Big Apple maps depict the same area and both predate plaintiff's accident, the later dated map most accurately portrays the area on the date...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases