1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 174 F.3d
  5. 174 F.3d 437 (1999)
 

KENDALL v. CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VA.

Nos. 98-1301, 98-1361.

174 F.3d 437 (1999)

Susan KENDALL; Barry Bailey; Keith Bailey; Linda Barnes; Joe Barnes; Andy Bridges; Eric Brown; George Bryan; Tammy Buchanan; Gary Burke; Kathleen Clark; John Coleman; Lake Critzer; Robin Dennis; Dominador Fermil; John Fusco; Paul Gorski; Thomas Green; Stan Glaser; Joseph Hoefling; Doug Markley; Pam Martin; Dennis McGee; Mary Morton; Larry Myers; Michelle Osborn; Robert Pugh; Kimberly Rabeau; Richard Ramsey; Todd Renigar; David Rose; Anthony Stewart; Charles Walker; Nancy Walley; Brenda Watt; Gilbert Williams, and Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA, Defendant-Appellee. Susan Kendall; Barry Bailey; Keith Bailey; Linda Barnes; Joe Barnes; Andy Bridges; Eric Brown; George Bryan; Tammy Buchanan; Gary Burke; Kathleen Clark; John Coleman; Lake Critzer; Robin Dennis; Dominador Fermil; John Fusco; Paul Gorski; Thomas Green; Stan Glaser; Joseph Hoefling; David Hildman; William Johnson; Terry King; Kevin Laughlin; David Long; Doug Markley; Pam Martin; Dennis McGee; Mary Morton; Larry Myers; Michelle Osborn; Robert Pugh; Kimberly Rabeau; Richard Ramsey; Todd Renigar; David Rose; Anthony Stewart; Charles Walker; Nancy Walley; Brenda Watt; Gilbert Williams, and Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. City of Chesapeake, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided April 8, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Andrew Michael Sacks, Sacks & Sacks, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellants. Thomas Jeffrey Salb, Breeden, McMillan & Green, P.L.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: David M. Peters, Breeden, McMillan & Green, P.L.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge:

The question raised in this case, which appears to be one of first impression, is whether plaintiffs can use 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.1998) to enforce their rights to overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-62 (1998). We hold that the elaborate remedial scheme provided in the FLSA demonstrates a congressional intent to prohibit § 1983 actions to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases