Defendant's generalized objections did not preserve his present challenges to the People's cross-examination of defendant concerning his lack of employment and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that since defendant's direct testimony contained an implication that he was employed at the time of the robbery, the cross-examination on that issue properly addressed his credibility. Moreover, there was no suggestion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
