Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs to the plaintiffs.
The appellants' motion to further depose the plaintiffs regarding questions which were objected to at the plaintiffs' examinations before trial effectively constituted an application to review the propriety of certain questions propounded at those examinations. It is well settled that an order made upon such an application is not appealable as of right (see, King v Salvation Army,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.