1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 266 A.D.2d
  5. 266 A.D.2d 328 (1999)
 

BECK v. AUSUBEL

266 A.D.2d 328 (1999)

698 N.Y.S.2d 163

THOMAS BECK et al., Respondents, v. HERBERT AUSUBEL, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided November 15, 1999.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

Contrary to the conclusion reached by the Supreme Court, we find that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that he underwent a continuing course of treatment so as to toll the Statute of Limitations (see, CPLR 214-a; Young v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 91 N.Y.2d 291; Nykorchuck v Henriques...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases