Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
The finding was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample circumstantial evidence of appellant's guilt, including evidence leading to the inescapable conclusion that appellant was the person who admitted the theft in a telephone call to the complainant. We reject, as highly speculative, the arguments
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
