1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 71 F.Supp.2d
  5. 71 F.Supp.2d 520 (1999)
 

SURETY TECHNOLOGIES v. ENTRUST TECHNOLOGIES

No. Civ.A. 99-203-A.

71 F.Supp.2d 520 (1999)

SURETY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and Telcordia Technologies, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. ENTRUST TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division.

November 4, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nanda Krishna Alapati, Pennie & Edmonds, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs.

Terence P. Ross, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Washington, DC, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

The parties in this patent infringement suit dispute the meaning of three terms or phrases in the patent claims in issue, thereby necessitating the claim construction determinations recorded here.

I. The '954 Patent

Plaintiffs Telcordia Technologies ("Telcordia") and Surety Technologies ("Surety") are, respectively, the owner of and the exclusive licensee under U.S.Patent Reissue No. 34,954 ("the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases