The motion court properly directed the parties to appear for a conference for the purpose of working out a disclosure schedule, in effect vacating defendant's 90-day notice, where the delay caused by plaintiff's failure to provide promised further responses to defendant's disclosure demands was not so extensive as to be indicative of an inclination not to proceed with the action (cf., Baczkowski v Collins Constr. Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SCHEURER v. XEROX CORPORATION
258 A.D.2d 332 (1999)
683 N.Y.S.2d 846
TRICIA SCHEURER, Respondent, v. XEROX CORPORATION, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 11, 1999.
Decided February 11, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
