1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 188 F.3d
  5. 188 F.3d 401 (1999)
 

GRAND RAPIDS PLASTICS, INC. v. LAKIAN

No. 98-1698.

188 F.3d 401 (1999)

GRAND RAPIDS PLASTICS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Craig M. LAKIAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided August 12, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John E. Anding (argued and briefed), Christopher G. Hastings (briefed), Drew, Cooper & Anding, Grand Rapids, MI, for Grand Rapids Plastics, Inc.

William H. Baughman, Jr. (briefed), Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley, Cleveland, OH; Thomas P. Casey (briefed), Harper Woods, MI, for Craig M. Lakian.

William J. Lamping (argued and briefed), Vestevich, Mallender, DuBois & Dritsas, Bloomfield Hills, MI, for James Chapman and H & L Engineering, Inc.

J. Walker Henry (briefed), Timothy D. Wittlinger, Clark Hill, P.L.C., Detroit, MI, for Pine River Plastics, Inc.

Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge, and JONES and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges.

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Chief Judge.

Grand Rapids Plastics, Inc. appeals the district court's findings that its Robinson-Patman Act claims were barred by the statute of limitations and that Grand Rapids had no tortious interference claim because it had no business relationship or expectancy with Daikyo-Decoma. We conclude that the district court correctly dismissed both claims.

I.

In 1988, Daikyo-Decoma, a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases