1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 258 A.D.2d
  5. 258 A.D.2d 330 (1999)
 

HARDWICK v. FENSTERSTOCK

258 A.D.2d 330 (1999)

685 N.Y.S.2d 446

JOYCE HARDWICK, Respondent, v. JAY FENSTERSTOCK, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided February 11, 1999.

Although we disapprove of plaintiff's attorney's ad hominem attacks on defendant's expert in the course of summation (see, Clarke v New York City Tr. Auth., 174 A.D.2d 268, 277-278), some of such comments were not objected to, and the remainder were not serious enough to deprive defendant of a fair trial. The trial court properly concluded that prior orders granting summary judgment to impleaded dentists who were employed by defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases