Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that the trial court's failure to instruct the jury that testimony of his prior violent acts against the murder victim were admitted into evidence for only a limited purpose constituted reversible error (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.