Defendant was not deprived of his right to be present during jury selection. The court reporter's notations relied upon by defendant fail to establish his absence from robing room conferences when read in the context of the entire voir dire record, along with all reasonable inferences that may be drawn therefrom (compare, People v Acevedo,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. MORALES
258 A.D.2d 327 (1999)
685 N.Y.S.2d 208
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWIN MORALES, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 11, 1999.
Decided February 11, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.