The court properly ruled that defendant's proposed agency defense would open the door to elicitation of the nature and underlying facts of his three prior convictions arising out of drug sales. We note that the court never made a final ruling on this issue, but only indicated how it might rule were defendant to give the proposed testimony, and it specifically deferred making a decision until defendant testified, an event which never occurred. In any event, the court properly...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
