1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 194 F.3d
  5. 194 F.3d 389 (1999)
 

ROYAL MORTG. CORP. v. F.D.I.C.

No. 1871, Docket No. 98-6251.

194 F.3d 389 (1999)

ROYAL MORTGAGE CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided September 23, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary H. Greenberg, New York, N.Y. (Steven D. Feldman, Orans, Elsen & Lupert, on the brief), for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Thomas C. Bahlo, Washington, D.C. (Ann S. DuRoss, Assistant General Counsel, Colleen J. Boles, Senior Counsel, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, on the brief), for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: NEWMAN, CARDAMONE, and JACOBS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff-Appellant Royal Mortgage Corp. ("Royal") appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Cedarbaum, J.), dismissing, on a motion for summary judgment of Defendant-Appellee Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. ("FDIC"), Royal's claim that it (rather than the FDIC) was the proper plaintiff in a pending state court action. Royal had purchased loans from the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases