Plaintiff's claim for legal malpractice, which was grounded in the alleged failure of his attorneys to advise him that he had negligence and Labor Law claims based on a workplace accident in addition to workers' compensation claims, accrued when he suffered damage, i.e., when the Statute of Limitations ran on his own claims in February of 1992 (see, Glamm v Allen,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
DAVIS v. ISAACSON, ROBUSTELLI, FOX, FINE, GRECO & FOGELGAREN, P. C.
258 A.D.2d 321 (1999)
685 N.Y.S.2d 216
KARL DAVIS, Respondent, v. ISAACSON, ROBUSTELLI, FOX, FINE, GRECO & FOGELGAREN, P. C., et al., Defendants, and BERNARD A. KUTTNER, Doing Business as and Also Known as KUTTNER LAW OFFICES and KUTTNER & AFFILIATES, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 11, 1999.
Decided February 11, 1999.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
