1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 187 F.3d
  5. 187 F.3d 392 (1999)
 

U.S. v. ARMSTRONG

No. 98-4905.

187 F.3d 392 (1999)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Mark ARMSTRONG, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided July 15, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Michael William Lieberman, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge LUTTIG wrote the opinion, in which Judges MICHAEL and MOTZ joined.

OPINION

LUTTIG, Circuit Judge:

This case presents the question whether the exclusionary rule applies in federal supervised release revocation hearings. For the reasons that follow, we hold that it does not.

I.

In 1992, appellant David Mark Armstrong pled guilty in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases