1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 261 A.D.2d
  5. 261 A.D.2d 316 (1999)
 

MATTER OF ROYAL CROSPIN CORP. v. NEW YORK CITY LOFT BOARD

261 A.D.2d 316 (1999)

691 N.Y.S.2d 416

In the Matter of ROYAL CROSPIN CORP., Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY LOFT BOARD, Respondent, and JILL BAKER et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided May 25, 1999.

Petitioner's challenge application was rejected because it was not served on the outgoing and prospective tenants at their respective addresses specified on their sale of improvements disclosure form, as required by 29 RCNY 2-07 (b) and (g) (1) (ii) (A), within 20 days after the tenants' additional information had been personally delivered to petitioner, as required by 29 RCNY 2-07 (b) and (f) (3). The 20-day time limit is clearly geared to the tenants' service of the additional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases